Categories
Blog

The Growing Importance of Streaming for Hollywood

2020 has proved to be a pretty difficult year for Hollywood, the main reason being the fact that the Covid-19 pandemic simultaneously shut down the vast majority of theaters around the world,\ and halted production on dozens of different major films that were supposed to release this year. The shutdown of theaters across the world also prevented a lot of movies that were ready for release from coming out, because there wouldn’t be any theaters open to show them. Although this was ultimately the wisest decision for both theaters and film studios in order to keep their workers and patrons safe, it’s also created a number of challenges for Hollywood for how to move on from here. When theaters slowly began to open at limited capacities around the U.S. in the summer, some studios tried to release the big films that they were sitting on in theaters. One such example was Christopher Nolan’s Tenet, which released early in September. Like many of Nolan’s other films, it received relatively positive reviews from critics and casual audiences alike, but its box office returns were fairly underwhelming compared to previous films from the director. These results can be confidently attributed to the fact that not a lot of people are going to the movies because of the pandemic, and there just aren’t as many movie theaters open as there were before everything shut down in March. This begs the question, how can Hollywood make money, or at the very least get some kind of exposure for their multi-million dollar budgeted films that have been delayed several times over because of the pandemic? Well, for some of the biggest studios in Hollywood, it would appear that the answer can be found in streaming services. 

Streaming services have always been a safe place for films to get more attention than they might in the theaters, primarily because of the pure convenience of being able to watch movies from home for a monthly fee that is often cheaper than a single bucket of popcorn. They’re often the last step in a film’s release cycle, as there has traditionally been more of a focus on theatrical and home video releases because that’s where the majority of Hollywood’s revenue comes from. However, now that revenue from those usual sources has declined dramatically, some major companies are taking to streaming services as a last resort. The two biggest companies to make waves with this shift in release strategy are Disney and Warner Bros., and their respective forays into releasing major films on streaming services have been met with mixed reactions. 

Disney was the first one to really make the news with their utilization of their streaming service, Disney Plus, in response to the devastating effects of the pandemic. Disney’s first move towards taking advantage of everyone being home and theaters being closed was to move up the release of Lin-Manuel Miranda’s incredibly popular historical musical, Hamilton, from its original theatrical release in summer of next year to a release on Disney Plus in July of this year. This proved to be a genius move on the part of Disney, as the viewership of the musical ended up being greater than the amount of people that had seen it on Broadway, sitting at about 2.7 million views within its first week of release. The release of Hamilton on Disney Plus bolstered the streaming service’s popularity, as it previously faced criticism for a lack of content up to that point. Disney was lauded for allowing subscribers to experience a Broadway show that is infamous for being difficult to acquire tickets for, and at no additional cost other than the monthly subscription fee. It would seem that Disney had come across a great way to subvert the effects of theaters being closed while maintaining some level of profit, but things would quickly fall apart for the house of mouse with their next foray into streaming releases. 

One of the biggest movies that Disney hyped up for 2020 was Mulan, a live-action adaptation of the beloved animated film from 1998. Anticipation for this movie was already shaky at best before the pandemic hit, as numerous trailers indicated a massive departure from the original film’s tone and content. Things went from bad to worse for the remake as Disney announced exactly how they would be releasing Mulan on to Disney Plus, and it wouldn’t be the same as how they released Hamilton. Instead of releasing Mulan on Disney Plus at no additional cost to subscribers, it would instead be available through something Disney termed “Premier Access”, which essentially meant that on top of the monthly fee for Disney Plus, people would need to shell out thirty dollars just to watch this one film that many people weren’t excited for to begin with. On top of this bizarre set up, Disney also said that film would become free for subscribers in December of this year, effectively giving everyone more of a reason to not pay the thirty dollars to watch Mulan and just wait till it became free to watch. Disney’s motivations behind this decision were pretty clear, they were trying to make back as much of the money that they spent to make and market Mulan as possible through Disney Plus, and the money that they get from subscription fees would not be enough to cover that. With the thirty dollar price tag being roughly the equivalent of three movie tickets, this strategy could have worked if it wasn’t for a film that looked like it would underwhelm before it even released. Ever since the backlash of the Mulan film ran its course, Disney hasn’t announced any new films to be released under a similar format, but there is one company that has seen what Disney did and plans to learn from their mistakes.

One of the newest streaming services on the scene is WarnerMedia’s HBO Max, which is essentially what used to be known as HBO Now but with a fancy new coat of purple and blue paint and some more content than just Game of Thrones. When HBO Max released in May of this year, it didn’t exactly make the biggest splash like Disney Plus did in November of 2019, but it had a respectable amount of content and continues to add more to this day. The platform has recently made waves however for its decision to release one of the most highly anticipated movies of 2020 for streaming. Wonder Woman 1984, the sequel to the very well-received Wonder Woman was set to release this year, but like many other films it faced delays because of the fact that many theaters simply weren’t open. The film moved from a summer release, to a fall release, and now it would seem that Warner Bros. has finally settled on releasing Wonder Woman 1984 in theaters and on HBO Max simultaneously on December 25th of this year. Warner decided to get one up on the house of mouse this time around, however, as they decided to leverage their ownership of HBO and DC Comics to bring fans the new Wonder Woman movie at no additional cost should they choose to watch on HBO Max. This came as a shock for many people, as Disney had seemed to set the terms for how movies would be released for streaming with their Mulan strategy. It would seem that HBO Max is doing all they can to avoid the mistakes that Disney previously made, while also trying to assert themselves in the streaming service market. This news was received very well by people itching to finally see the newest Wonder Woman movie, and if the release of Hamilton on Disney Plus is any indication, the handling of Wonder Woman 1984 is likely to bring in a lot of new subscribers for HBO Max.

With the ball officially in Disney’s court, it will be interesting to see how they follow up on HBO Max’s decision to capitalize on Wonder Woman 1984, while also trying to salvage their streaming reputation. One move that the company could make that would echo HBO Max would be to release the long-awaited Black Widow movie on Disney Plus. This would even the playing field between HBO Max and Disney Plus so to speak, as Disney would also have a major superhero film exclusive to their platform. So long as Disney doesn’t slap some kind of “Premier Access” on the film, it would definitely bring in a surge of viewers that are looking to watch the newest addition to the Marvel Cinematic Universe. What do you think of big studios putting their movies on streaming services instead of or at the same time as in theaters? Is this something that could carry on when movie theaters start to operate normally again, or is this just Hollywood’s way of making the best out of a bad situation? Let us know in the comments below, and for more news on pop culture and everything entertainment, check back here at its-bananas.

Categories
Blog

Things the Percy Jackson TV Show Should and Shouldn’t Do If It Wants to Succeed

Fans of Greek mythology and young adult fiction rejoice! Earlier this year, Rick Riordan, author of the widely successful Percy Jackson and the Olympians novels, announced that Disney is going to produce another live-action adaptation of his books in the form of a TV series on Disney Plus. This news was met with elation from fans, as readers of the Percy Jackson series are still reeling from the atrocious film adaptations that 20th Century Fox produced in 2010 and 2013. Since Disney acquired 20th Century Fox back in March of 2019, they now have free license to use any of the properties that Fox owned in the past. This makes a Percy Jackson TV series into a perfect opportunity for the house of mouse. Not only would it beef up the amount of original content on their streaming platform, but it would also drive in new subscriptions from those that read the books in the past and have avoided signing up for Disney Plus up to this point. This will only work however if Disney makes the Percy Jackson series right, and there are a number of ways to accomplish that. There are also some very important things to avoid with this series so that it doesn’t become just another failure like the movie adaptation. We’re gonna discuss these do’s and don’ts below, and hopefully Disney will make the Percy Jackson series into everything the fans could ever ask for.

Do: Stay loyal to the source material

One of the biggest faults of the two Percy Jackson movies was how it more or less disregarded the books completely. Among the many egregious differences between the story of the books and the movies, some include: Percy being 17 in the movies when he’s only 12 in the books, pivotal characters like Ares being almost completely absent from the first movie, and the entire plotline of Kronos’ resurrection being condensed into one film when it took until the last books in the series. With these examples, it’s clear that the bar is set pretty low for Disney’s adaptation. All they need to do is stick to Rick Riordan’s writing and they can’t go wrong. 

Don’t: Use too much CGI

Something that the Percy Jackson TV series should stay away from is an overabundance of CGI. This is not to say that using CGI effects at all is a bad thing, they have proved to be a revolutionary tool in filmmaking for quite some time now. At the same time however, we can all think of a movie or TV show that used such distracting computer effects that it took away from the overall feeling of what we are trying to watch, and the Percy Jackson series will have to avoid that to keep the attention of fans. Now there is the issue that with a show centered around Greek mythology, it would be pretty difficult and expensive to make practical creatures such as the Minotaur, but Disney already has some experience using more practical effects for its original series. The Mandalorian has been a shining example of what happens when a studio places a focus on practical effects when possible and uses computer effects as sparingly as they can. One particular innovation that Disney used for The Mandalorian that the Percy Jackson series should take advantage of is the new “Stagecraft” technology. This new filmmaking tool is essentially a big wall of LED lights that acts as a projector of sorts for any kind of environment that a director may want to use. It eliminates the need for costly sets, and it makes the world around the characters seem more natural than that of a green screen. If the Percy Jackson series were to use this technology it would make for some incredibly breathtaking environments, especially for scenes that take place in the Underworld or Olympus. 

Do: Keep the show accessible

If the Percy Jackson series is going to be an all-around success, it’s going to have to perform a bit of a tightrope walk with its overall tone. This show is going to be in a bit of a weird place as far as its audience is concerned, because although the books are meant for an audience of roughly middle school and high school age, the vast majority of the fanbase is somewhere in their early twenties now. It sort of has a Harry Potter effect to it all; the Percy Jackson books were first published about fifteen years ago, so the people that grew up with the series when they were in grade school are now in college or preparing to graduate from college. This presents an interesting challenge for Disney for how they want the show to proceed. They could go with a more child friendly, almost Disney Channel, feel to the show, but this would likely alienate the older Percy Jackson fanbase. On the flipside, if they were to make the show too mature it would run the risk of being inaccessible to a younger audience that may just be getting into the books. In order to succeed, the Percy Jackson series is going to have to strike a balance between these two things much like the Marvel movies do. The one thing that makes the Marvel movies so popular is how they are entertaining and engaging for older, die-hard fans and younger newcomers alike. And with Disney’s experience in finding this balance with the Marvel movies, there’s no reason the Percy Jackson series can’t do the same. 

Don’t: Rush through the story

For the Percy Jackson series to be truly successful, it’s going to have to take its time. This time around the producers of this series aren’t limited to the roughly two hour time frame of most movies, so they can take as many episodes and seasons as they need to tell this story, and they should use that to their advantage. Now as far as Disney Plus is concerned, Disney hasn’t exactly produced any original series that are longer than about ten episodes a season. This is where Disney would have to take a bit of a risk, because just ten episodes would not be nearly enough time to tell the story of the Percy Jackson books. In order to allow each character to get as much development as possible and to make sure that plotlines aren’t rushed, Disney should adopt a structure similar to that of the many CW series, like Arrow and Supernatural. These series have episodes that are about forty-five minutes long, and each season consists of between fifteen and twenty episodes. This would work perfectly for the Percy Jackson series because not only would the forty-five minute structure ensure that each of the main characters gets the appropriate amount of screen time, but each of the books in the first Percy Jackson series are about twenty chapters long. This would allow each episode to be a chapter, and each season to be one whole book. Using a structure like this would help to prevent the Percy Jackson show from becoming just like the Percy Jackson movies because they wouldn’t have to do a full sprint through the story. Disney would be able to do what anyone else does when reading a book and take the series one chapter at a time.

With the Disney Percy Jackson series on the way, and a Kane Chronicles movie series apparently in the works at Netflix, it’s never been a more exciting time to be a fan of Rick Riordan’s writing. Here’s hoping that both companies are able to stick the landing and deliver an experience that fans have been waiting for. What are you most excited to see in the Percy Jackson TV show? Let us know in the comments below and for more news on pop culture and everything entertainment, check back here at its-bananas.com.